HC ALLAHABAD
Child born out of rape will have inheritance rights to biological father’s property
Date:3-Nov-15 | Shabihul Hasnain J.
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnVnNmYkc2UW1jcEU&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
HC of MADRAS
Judicial process should not be used to harass litigants and said insistence on appearance of the parties before the Court is needed only if it becomes absolutely necessary for some purpose.
Date:25-Sep-15 | J. S. Vaidyanathan
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnVU1TMVhjc05XaU0&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
SC of INDIA
1995 Republic Day Blasts in Jammu Acquittal Judgment
Date:1-Jul-15 | Uday Umesh Lalit
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnQ09abWhJeEJHTEk&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
HC of Madras, Madurai Bench
Madras HC expressed his view regarding Misuse of Domestic Violence Act-2005 and also declared Daughter-in-Law as third part in matter of Father-in-Law’s promotion, hence fined by 5000/-
Date:8-Jun-15 | J. S. Vaidhnathan
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnWDZDZldvWTZkY1E&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
SC of INDIA
Photos of Prime Minister, President, Chief Justice of India only now allowed in govt ads
Date:13-May-15 | J.Ranjan Gogoi
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0Lnc2lWb0FOVGRubVU&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
Delhi
FIR Quashed as All incidances mentioned in FIR happened outside india and not in delhi.
Date: 6-Aug-10 | JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Amit Sharma Versus
State & Ors.
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnbVlxdkhGVzNSZVU&export=download” title=”3_Amit_Sharma_vs_State___Ors._on_6_August,_2010.pdf” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Names of family members were quashed from case
Description:though some overtact alleged to have been attributed against the father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the complainant who were the petitioners No. 2,3 and 5 herein but such allegation could not be substantiated in the statement of the complainant on her solemn affirmation
Date/Corum: **** | Mr. Justice D.K.Sinha
1.Ajit Kumar Rai Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand
2.Rekha Devi Opp. Parties.
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LncXphVnBBOU1razg&export=download” title=”6_app 1155 of 2010 Ajit_Kumar_Rai_vs_Unknown_on_25_March,_2011.pdf” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
BOMBAY
Jurisdiction of case and definition of domicile
Description:Jurisdiction for filing divorce is India or US for present case, definition of Domicile
Date: 4th March, 2010 | SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, J.
Ms.Kokila Kalra with Mr.Abhijit Sarawate for Petitioner.
Mr.Sanjiv A. Sawant for Respondent.
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnbzRUS2JmUWxIVEk&export=download” title=”29_Kashmira Kale Vs Kishorkumar Mohan Kale.pdf” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]