Rajesh Sharma & ors. vs. State of UP
Significance of this judgement is that the misuse of 498a has been recognised again and direction to establish family welfare committee has been made and stop on immediate arrest have been directed.
Date:27/07/2017
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=1jb-CiceGi4WD_keZRHteQ7io7sJ2lhRI&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
SC of India
SC issued guidelines on completing prosecution witness within 2 years and 3 years of charge framing.
Date:08/10/1998
[google-drive-embed url=”https://drive.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnTDZGeHpON1dEN1k&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
HC of Gujrat
Gujrat HC order to Follow SC Order in Arnesh Judgment Circular.
Date:21/06/2015
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnZ193dVdDT0k0RTA&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
SC of India
SHIELD AGAINST FALSE CASES, SC OD INDIA SAYS PROOF MUST
Date: 3/24/2015
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnaDFJdUM5bC05YVk&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
SC of INDIA
Just Naming Distance Relative in not Enough to Summon them without the Mention of Specific Role in 498A
Date: 16-Mar-15
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0Lnd3ZhSGpCNVNpNDA&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
HC of MADRAS
Madras HC judgement on increasing FakeCases of Dowry and Rape
Date: 23-Dec-14 | S. Nagamuthu
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnSHBBTERyREh5V00&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
HC of DELHI and NEW DELHI
Aquital in IPC 498A or DOWRY CASE
Date: 14-Aug-14
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnRWZOLTMzRWZoS0k&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
HC of MUMBAI
Recent Judgment on 498Av
Date:28-Jul-14
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnbjdMdnRKWVFBN3c&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
HC on MUBAI
Another SLAP by Mumbai HC
Date:25-Jul-14
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnYWR3WklMbDRZSkE&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
SC of INDIA
Case Registred in IPC 498A QUASHED
Date:21-Jul-14
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnelhIMkFGQ2RHeEE&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
HC of KERLA
Release KIN if Innocent in CRUELTY Cases
Date:3-Jul-14
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnX3M2cmVUUDBOZkU&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
SC of India
No arrests under anti-dowry law without magistrate’s nod
Date:2-Jul-14 | Chandramauli Kumar
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LndEwzMWVzeGRnU3M&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
Gujarat
Vauge alligations are liable to quash
Date: 22-Sep-10 MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI
AKHILESHWARSINGH ARUNKUMAR SINGH – Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 – Respondent(s)
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnTzlkcmRkUUF0RHc&export=download” title=”8_appl 1007 of 2010 Aakhileshwarsingh arunkumar singh Vs State of Gujarat 2010.pdf” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
KERALA
498 quashed as both parties had settled their issues.
Date: 18-Dec-06 | R.BASANT
ABDUL KADER, S/O.CHARALIL MOHAMMED,
… Petitioner
Vs
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
… Respondent
2. SUHARABI.M., D/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnOWgwUTVfcGNZRHM&export=download” title=”9_appl 4061 of 2006 Abdul_Kader,_S_O.Charalil_…_vs_The_State_Of_Kerala,_Represented_…_on_18_December,_2006.pdf” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
KERALA
There is settlement between parties and both parties wants to live together,both of them has requested court to quash FIR
Date: 24-May-07 | R.BASANT
1. BIJUKUMAR, AMBADI HOUSE, CHANDRA
… Petitioner
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY
… Respondent
2. SANDHYA, AGED 27 YEARS, W/O.BIJUKUMAR
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnV2J3cFJYWVJHZE0&export=download” title=”17_Bijukumar,_Ambadi_House,_Chandra_vs_State_Of_Kerala,_Rep._By_on_24_May,_2007.pdf” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
DELHI
There were no aalegations tat crime were comitted to delhi, there are alligations abouts happenings in Mumbai, So instead of quashing FIR, It is transffered to Mumbai PS.
Date: 3-Jan-08 | SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Bimla Rawal and Ors. …….Petitioners
Through : Mr. N.Hariharan,Advocate
versus
State (NCT Of Delhi) and Anr. ……… Respondents
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnWHpfS29nbWVRaWs&export=download” title=”18_Bimla Rawal versus Delhi State on 03 Jan 2008.pdf” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
BOMBAY
Return of NRI passport seized by police only after completion of procecution before JMFC
Date: November 18, 2008 | S. B. MHASE & A. A. SAYED,JJ
Mr. Dhavalshree Surendra Saraiya
& Others. ..Petitioners.
Versus.
The Union of India
& Anr. ..Respondents
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnZHVZTjlydVBmaUk&export=download” title=”44_HC_Bombay_498a_NRI_Passport_2008_1993.pdf” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
PUNJAB AND HARYANA
mere violation of the condition of bail cannot be said to be such a circumstance, which would require the bail that has been granted to be cancelled.
Date: 28.1.2010 | S.S. SARON, J.
Harish Puri
. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
. Respondents
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnWlkzYW9DV2daME0&export=download” title=”45_Harish_Puri_vs_Unknown_on_28_January,_2010.pdf” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
BOMBAY
498a Can not be filed after 3 years of last incident
Date: 7-Jun-10 | Bench: A B Chaudhari
1. Satish @ Rajendra s/o Harbans Tiwari,
aged 42 years.
2. Harbans Tiwari Shivsahay,
aged 72 years, Occ.: Retired.
3. Smt. Shakuntala w/o Harbans Tiwari,
aged 64 years, Occupation : Household.
4. Surendra s/o Harbhans Tiwari,
aged 38 years.
5. Manoj s/o Harbans Tiwari,
aged 36 years.
6. Smt. Gayatri w/o Santosh Tiwari
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnRWphdnI1VTdWTzQ&export=download” title=”53_Bombay_Nos._1_To_5_R_O_Dr._Mazumdar_Ward_vs_Aged_40_Years,_Occupation___…_on_7_June,_2010.pdf” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]