HC of KOLKATA
Contesting respondent has come to the HC with unclean hands and withholds a vital document in order to gain advantage on the other side. In our opinion, he would be guilty of playing fraud on the Court as well as on the opposite party. A person whose case is based on falsehood can be summarily thrown out at any stage of the litigation.
Date:25-Mar-08
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnS2NqZDVHekVYY00&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
HC of KOLKATA
Contesting respondent has come to the HC with unclean hands and withholds a vital document in order to gain advantage on the other side. In our opinion, he would be guilty of playing fraud on the Court as well as on the opposite party. A person whose case is based on falsehood can be summarily thrown out at any stage of the litigation.
Date:25-Mar-08 | J. Kalidas Mukharjee
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnY1Y5R1Utbm1mNnM&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
SC of INDIA
The learned Metropolitan Magistrate held that as the question whether the will was a genuine document or a forged one, was an issue before the District Judge in the probate proceedings where the will had been filed, Sections 195 and Cr.P.C. operated as a bar for taking cognizance
Date:11-Mar-05 | J. R. C. LAHOTI
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LndlhlZmxpLVRJT0E&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
SC of INDIA
For the cases of perjury/182 CrPC it is not necessary to file application u/s 340 CrPC. If you have proper documentary evidence of the falsehood, go ahead and straight away file a private complaint case! Applications u/s 340 CrPC are not allowed since the courts are reluctant on that, so use this Honble Apex Court’s constitutional bench authority ‘IQBAL SINGH MARWAH AND ANOTHER Versus MEENAKSHI MARWAH AND ANOTHER’ and file complaint case even under sections barred to be taken cognizance u/s 195 CrPC
Date:11-Mar-05
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnZFdFOTFna0lUOGs&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
SC of INDIA
For the cases of perjury/182 CrPC it is not necessary to file application us 340 CrPC. If you have proper documentary evidence of the falsehood, go ahead and straight away file a private complaint case. Applications u/s 340 CrPC are not allowed since the courts are reluctant on that, so use this Honble Apex Court’s constitutional bench authority “IQBAL SINGH MARWAH AND ANOTHER Versus MEENAKSHI MARWAH AND ANOTHER” and file complaint case even under sections barred to be taken cognizance us 195 CrPC.
Date:11-Mar-05 | J. R. C. LAHOTI
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnRVdOZS1WWExkdnc&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow
Perjury Application Must be Decided First Before Proceeding with the Case
Date:9-Jan-03
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnRFVsZFdHcFE1Y0U&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Perjury Application Must be Decided First Before Proceeding with the Case
Date:9-Jan-03 | J. A. Mateen
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnUlJxbTlGSkdma0k&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]