Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the hueman domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
IPC 304B – Vaastav Foundation

IPC 304B

1. Addl Session Judge, Rohini Delhi

Minor incidents of beatings do not amount to cruelty upon wife, a trial court on Monday said while acquitting a man in the dowry death case of his wife. Giving the benefit of doubt
Date:30-Mar-15
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnNGkyU1NISTFFaDQ&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]

2. HC of MADRAS

Madras HC acquits man who criticised wife for being DARK
Date:6-Mar-15 | J.M.Sathyanarayanan
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnUXE4QTd2WVRkYzQ&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]

3. SC of INDIA

306 abetment to suicide. It was warring couple on the verge if divorce, it was in these circumstances when wife committed suicide claiming reason illicit relations of husband, for which he was prosecuted u/s 306. SC said in those abnormal and warring circumstances, husband’s illicit relation cannot be construed to be cruelty towards wife. SC has not justified illicit relations, but has only said that under those circumstances, he was not liable to be punished u/s 306
Date:18-Feb-15 | J. Deepak Mishra
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnM2pjbTNtb2xWZkk&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]

4. HC of MADRAS

Man can’t be prosecuted if hypersensitive wife ends life
Date:27-Aug-14 | M. Venugopal
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnYkprSU5SZUhYOTQ&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]

5. SC of INDIA

In Karan Singh and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana , the supreme court has ruled that mere general allegation of dowry demand is not sufficient in dowry death cases.
Date:15-Apr-14
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnUnFsMU1lNlhRUnc&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]

6. HC od DELHI and NEW DELHI

Writ Petetion for FILLING DOWRY DEATH against IN-LAW is dismissed on the ground that it does not have any weight
Date:31-Aug-07
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnNUdULVNYblZ6aDQ&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]

7. HC of RAJASTHAN

Alleging Impotency amounts to immense mental agony and cruelty
Date:29-Oct-84
[google-drive-embed url=”https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B5hJQiEAA0LnMjFfTmlFZFpBSkE&export=download” title=”Download” icon=”https://ssl.gstatic.com/docs/doclist/images/icon_12_pdf_list.png” style=”download”]